Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Q&A’ Category


Interview: Huntronik


Last month, I received a nondescript album submission from Huntronik, an electro-infused trio from Brooklyn. It was the type of email that typically gets buried in the siege of PR spam that floods our inbox on a daily basis. If I was a more intelligent man, I would spend my days designing an algorithm that filters e-mail based upon whether it was sent by a press agency or the band itself. Unfortunately, I only recently learned how to spell algorithm, so that venture will have to wait until a later day.

Within the submission was Huntronik’s debut, self-titled LP. The album features nine, concisely crafted, imminently danceable tracks that straddle the line between krautrock and more traditional, synth-heavy electronic fare. From the initial listen, it was apparent that Huntronik had more going on than the typical bedroom DJ and electronic dance output that has become so trite since multi-track home recording became the right of the everyman a decade or so ago.

The tracks combined textures and tones from a wide swath of influences. The lyrics were both cerebral and playful, growing in depth as each sonic layer was peeled back. I was immediately taken with the release, and wanted to know more. So I reached out Huntronik’s architect and lead vocalist Greg Hunt about doing an interview.

Below, you’ll find the culmination of two chats with Hunt. For readability’s sake, I’ve combined our two discussions. During the interview, we talked about Hunt’s recording process, his goals for the release, his influences – music and otherwise. We talked at length about Hunt’s fascination with the theories of scientist and designer of artificial intelligence, Hugo de Garis. De Garis is a mathematical physicist and leading researcher in the field of evolvable hardware, which uses genetic algorithms to evolve neural networks using three dimensional cellular automata inside field programmable gate arrays. You know, just your everyday music chat. Stream Huntronik’s debut LP, and read the bulk of our interview below.

Connect with Huntronik via Facebook | Twitter


How was your vacation?

I went to some, random. exploited Carribean island, and drank some girly drinks with big umbrellas on them. I went with my girlfriend and my family. It’s good to be back in our studio. I’m here now – in Greenpoint. I live in Brooklyn. Steve lives in Jersey, I think he’s moving to Brooklyn. John lives in Brooklyn. I’m originally from a town called Acton, right outside of Boston.

What brought you to New York originally?

I moved here four years ago. Just music. I had always played music my whole life, and I just really wanted to buckle down and grind it out in New York.

What kind of music were you into initially?

Initially, I was playing piano when I was about eight, and I played jazz music off and on. It would start and stop from eight to twelve, and in high school I started up again and kinda got into electronic music. I dunno. I listened to maybe like Chemical Brothers or something in high school and was kind of fascinated with two guys and these strange terminals and consoles that were actually kind of conducting this dance music, which I wasn’t at all familiar with. But I started getting into a combination of rock and electronic.

What made you make Huntronik a full band project, as opposed to something you’re just trying to accomplish on your own?

I really wanted to play everything as instruments. Even the electronic sounds. When we play live, we play those with our hands. There is actually only a few loops. Like two drum loops. I’m not a fan of loops or looping anything. It’s like 70s rock. I like that. But I do really like electronics that are kind of grimy and old and kind of feel like they grew out of something. I don’t like clean sounds. My favorite synth is EMS 50 from 1970. It’s like the greatest thing ever. It’s one of the first synthesizers ever made.

Talk about your writing process a little bit. Are these songs that you pretty much construct on your own and take them to the other two members?

Maybe half of the songs, I would just do on my own. Some of them were slower than others, as the process goes. When it was slower, we would tend to do a group thing. But that also worked really well. The song “Rabies” was definitely a really slow, group process that took a few months and the same is true for “Deeper Watts” which went through a number of different versions. It started out as something completely different, and then it just became this kind of groove-oriented song. But most of them, like say “No Deceiver” for example, I just did pretty much on my own and then we just framed it as a group.

Talk more about the various versions of “Deeper Watts” and how the band wound up settling on the end result.

Originally, the song had words and it was structured in a difficult way. In other words, I think we all agreed that it wasn’t enough of a song as it was when we started. And then we just decided to take the elements of the song that we enjoyed the most and re-work the song. So it ended up being kind of a more mellow. It worked as something to put in between songs with words. Cause we do like instrumentals. We like a lot of scapes.

A lot of people talk about music as math in language form, or something like that. And I’m not a musician, but music doesn’t register in that way for me. It’s more of a combination between creativity, technical skill and somebody’s ability to effectively communicate. You said that you don’t like loops, and prefer these dirty electronic sounds that feel like they grew out of something. Talk more about what you mean by that, and where that gets lost with most electronic music.

A great example is Conrad Schnitzler. He’s this guy who was one of the founding electronic composers back in the late 60s and 70s on up to his death a few years back. And, what he did was use these really obscure synthesizers to make music that sounded like some kind of alien communication or something. It’s very strange. It sounds completely organic. I think that there’s a certain sense of wonder that come from that kind of electronic music that you’ll never really get from that more mechanistic stuff. I also like German minimal house or something. But it’s almost like a different thing completely.

I mean, this term electronic to me is confusing, because there’s an argument that you could make that guitar music electronic. So it’s a confusing distinction to try to draw. But it just means more that I want to hear something that sounds like it’s alive I suppose.

What are some examples of stuff that you’re listening to these days?

Well for rock, I like bands like Iceage, The Men, and Cave. Cave actually came out of Indiana, I believe. It might’ve been Illinois. It’s either Indiana or Illinois. [They’re currently based out of Chicago] For older rock, I like kraut bands like Can. For electronic stuff, I like this guy Pole, whose name I think is Stefan Betke. For older electronic stuff I like guys that were using really big, strange boxes. I have a bunch of really obscure records that are just crazy sounding today that people don’t really make. I guess Oneohtrix Points Never is like one example of contemporary electronics that I dig.

I remember when we were exchanging emails you mentioned Super Meat Boy, are you a gamer?

Yeah, a little bit. I played Super Meat Boy, X-Com. That was fun my friend has that. Yeah, you know. It’s fun.

On tracks like Deeper Watts, I get like subtle influences of video game sounds. Are those conscious influences at all or not so much?

I think so. I like 8-bit type sounds. I just like texture a lot. It’s odd, because I like melody a lot, but I also like texture. It’s one of those things I think people who are 30 or under grew up with. They were around video games and I think it permeated their brains or palate if you will.

Are there any other non-musical influences that informed this record at all?

Definitely. This guy who is a professor of computer science named Hugo de Garis. The song “We Can Build You” is basically just me trying to deal with a lot of his ideas and theories about computers. It’s hard really to articulate this, but I think today people do not associate rock music – at all – with computers. I guess if you say “computers and music,” most people are thinking of electronic music, and that definitely plays into it. But when you say computers, you don’t really think of rock music and I was trying to make a serious rock album that dealt with the future and what the future might be about for humans. I think Hugo de Garis has an interesting approach to rock.

I haven’t read his books, does he address something about music specifically. Or how did you apply what he was talking about to music?

That was the big challenge. It wasn’t all him. I don’t think he ever talks about music, but my big challenge was that if I want to approach taking this seriously. If I want to write a song like “We Can Build You,” for example. If I want to write a song about a higher intelligence and put it into the framework of rock music. Is that even doable? Will it still be interesting? I thought it turned out okay. I think, maybe it’s not something people will get all the way. Like, a lot of people will say, maybe this means something else. And that’s part of the fun. I don’t ever want to put something on a silver platter and say this is what this is. I like when people have their own interpretations.

I watched like two-thirds of that 21-part interview with de Garis. It’s fascinating stuff.

I remember when I watched that, I was pretty disturbed by it. I dunno. I work through a lot of ideas anxieties and problems through music. So, now I actually feel nothing about it. But yeah, I remember feeling really disturbed. But yeah, it’s interesting.

He’s most concerned with this issue of species dominance and its potential to inspire mass violence, but you said that you were less concerned with the pros and cons of what this technological evolution is causing. And that you were more interested in how it’s affecting our interactions with each other right now. I just wondered how you were able to push off that “threat” for lack of a better term.

That’s a great question. I think, for me, the way I see looking into the feature. I think the scientific community, generally the rule is, if you can view it, it can be done. So I just kind of internalized that, and said forget it. Whatever anxiety I have, there’s really not much to worry about, because whatever is going to happen will probably just happen. In other words, if I feel fear or anxiety about where technology is headed, there’s no point in me fighting something that can’t be stopped. I feel, not complacent, but I feel content that the direction technology is headed. But I don’t feel good about the way that people see themselves or see others, necessarily?

What do you mean by that?

For me, I know that there is a tendency now to be distracted and to lose focus on one thing, simply because there’s more distractions and there are more things coming at us. So, in that light, interacting with other people can become sitting in a room looking at a screen rather than being physically present. It’s that thing you’ve heard over and over: Oh, give a person a call and go hang out. But, I’m not necessarily sure that technology’s not good for socializing with people. It’s just something I wonder about.


You wrestle with some serious topics on the debut. I’m willing to bet that the vast majority of people who hear the record, or see the band play live are not going to be digesting these songs on that level. So why do you think Huntronik’s music resonates beyond the heady stuff? What do you think allows it to reach listeners on other levels?

Mostly because it’s not a joke. The music is rhythmic, but the instrumentation that we use is a little strange. I use synths. I play a sampler like a keyboard. But I think fundamentally, it’s because the song structures and the grooves resonate on a musical level. I think you’re absolutely right. If you’re just casually listening to some band and you’re hearing these songs, I don’t think you would necessarily make the connection of what I had in mind. But it’s possible to come up with your own interpretations that will satisfy you as a listener.

How did the band come together initially?

Basically, it was me and this other guy playing bass originally. The other guy left, and John – the drummer – joined up, and then Steve joined up. Now, we have to swap out John because he can’t afford the band  – he has to go and work. But there’s been a few different members. But it was originally just a duo, and now we’re a trio.

You said the other member has to go to work, does that mean you don’t have a day job?

Well, I vacillate between walking dogs and working at restaurants. Anything I can do to pay the rent.

Keep fightin’ the good fight. What are the plans for 2013?

For 2013, I’d like basically to get the album heard by as many people as we can, so that we can tour. I’ve got a lot of ideas about new music. I hope the other group members will be into it, and we can work on that. But pretty much, just playing shows and trying to get people to hear the record.

Are you planning to continue to explore this theme of technological evolution? What kind of ideas are you wrestling with?

I think I’m going to move away from the technology thing. Aesthetically, I think it will be similar. This is just guesswork at this point, but I think we might grow in a way, harsher. Not more abrasive, but I’d say more attacking or aggressive. I keep hearing these sounds, rhythms and stuff and I want to try to get to them. But I think lyrically, there are other things that I may want to try to approach. More along the lines of just being a person, and not framing it with science or theories or anything like that.

Interview and introduction by Rob Peoni


Thought on Tracks Interview: Introducing The Shamefaced Sparrows

We receive a hefty dose of artist submissions at Thought on Tracks. Somewhere in the ballpark of 25 to 35 per week. I do my damnedest to fulfill our promise on our Contact Us page. I listen to everything – at least a couple of tracks. But to put it kindly, most of what we receive doesn’t exactly fall within my taste. That isn’t to say it’s terrible, just not my bag man. There are exceptions though, and one of those recent exceptions came in the form of three demos from a London export called The Shamefaced Sparrows. Their sound rests heavily upon the type of fuzzy surf pop that has been dominating my playlist the last few months. I was intrigued enough to request some more information, and more information they provided. Below you will find an interview that showcases a dry wit that serves as the foundation of the best British humor. Though this project is just gaining its footing, the music and personality behind it has piqued my interest. Listen to “The Madison”, “Murder in the Dollhouse” and meet the band below.
“The Madison” (demo)

“Murder in the Dollhouse”


Who is in the band?

Steve Jarvis and Liam Riley. Steve sings and writes the melodies/lyrics, Liam plays and writes the music. As for the live line-up, in the brief time of The Shamefaced Sparrows’ existence, a small flock of musicians have fled before they could settle the nest…

…we had a bass player, Tyrone, who insisted on calling Liam “Reg Thorpe.” We still don’t know why. We played him our track “The Madison” and he tried to convince us selling it to another band to fund his drug habit was a capital idea. He later stole Liam’s plectrums and we haven’t heard of him since. So Tyrone, if your reading..

We also had a drummer who left the band before we had even rehearsed. Twice. She was so insecure about her drumming, she refused to even play in front of us. If you’re looking for a drummer, a paralysing lack of confidence in their own ability is, we can assure you, bottom of the list of criteria.

She would also make ludicrous statements such as ‘Meg White was the real driving force behind The White Stripes’ and ‘Lou Reed would be nothing without Moe Tucker’. Now, we admire – love even – both Meg White and Moe Tucker. However, we can’t help but feel Jack White and Lou Reed would have somehow traversed the staggeringly deep abyss of absent rudimentary drumming, and continued to fashion a semi-decent music career anyway.

Then there was Madame Lagrange, our former rhythm guitarist. But that’s a story with too many chapters for now.

Where were the demos recorded?
All the songs we’ve put online are home recordings and done on a battered four-track. It’s the type of recorder that likes to delete songs of its own free will.

We’re not even sure exactly how to work the recorder efficiently. All we can say with even a morsel of assurance is that the red button means record.

We used to share a shoe-box sized rehearsal room in Bethnal Green with another band. They borrowed a guitar from Liam – a vintage ’63 Gretch – and they broke it, snapped the neck clean off. Of course, they promised to pay up. And, of course, the payment never came. A friend of a friend knew the culprits and informed us of where they were now rehearsing. We found the place, doors-ajar, and commandeered the recorder and a guitar whilst our girlfriends played the (scantily-clad) diversion. The perfect swindle or barefaced thievery?

So – we’ve never had any instructions for it. And it’s never forgiven us.

How did the band come together/How long have you been playing?
We’ve known each other since we were thirteen. We had shared mutual friends, one of which introduced us, knowing we were both music enthusiasts. As per the rules of playground hierarchy, we had ourselves a quiz-off – where did this song get to in the charts? when did this band release so and so album? how many haircuts has Skrillex got on the same head? On that very day, we swore a blood-oath to create music of our own.

And then, more than a decade later, we did.

Exact dates are hard to pinpoint. Mostly, we spent our time wandering fields, climbing trees and sleeping under hedgerows, discussing the music we would make if only we’d stop wandering fields, climbing trees and sleeping under hedgerows. The greater part of our time is still spent on those activities. In fact, all of our songs concern some grassland escapade or other. But when the weather will not permit us to venture outdoors, we make music. The three Soundcloud tracks are the first three songs we ever wrote.

What has the response to the project been like? Interest? Shows?
We’re supposed to make our live debut as (a tiny) part of the Camden Crawl on May 6th (The Shamefaced Sparrows will play at The Camden Head at 7:30 PM). The Camden Crawl might be described as London’s version of SXSW. But really, if SXSW is Emily Dickinson, then the Camden Crawl is Carol Ann Duffy.

In the last few months, we have had interest from A & R, labels, managers, blogs and the like…but the strongest interest in us would surely be that of Magda The Kings Cross Ballerina. Magda seems to think sending us one incoherent lipstick-written letter a week is a reasonable route of seduction. She also discovered that we are rather keen on wild flowers – so she sent us a home-made bouquet of Daffodils, Foxgloves and Daisies with random petals painted black with nail varnish. A unique gesture if nothing else – after all, how often does romance and downright horror entwine?

For her sake, can we state in print, that we have officially turned down her offer to nail a dead sparrow to Liam’s front door.

What is the band’s goal for 2012?
To retrieve Liam’s plectrums.
What led you guys to the Link Wray/surf pop stuff?
When we were schoolboys, we both shared a semi-obsession with Pulp Fiction. We had twin-goals; A) To morph into Vincent Vega and B) To escape dreary Leicester * with Mia Wallace in tow. But, unfathomably, that never materialised.

Our yearning was not easily surrendered though. Such was our desire, we made a promise that when one of us turned 16, the other would dress like Miss Wallace – white blouse, short black bob, general air of unattainable cool – whilst doing a sensual dance to ‘Son of a Preacher Man’. We would lower the lights until ”Mia” passably resembled Mia. However, this meant dimming the lights so low that we ended up sat on a couch in a darkness thicker than pitch, eating party sausages and listening to Dusty Springfield

These shenanigans did result in some tangible benefit though. Tarantino’s flick-knife surf soundtrack became ingrained in us. But for a while we assumed Link Wray was like most surf rock artists in that their oeuvre was limited to a handful of outstanding tracks.

But then, in pursuing another of our-semi obsessions, namely the new wave films of Jean-Luc Goddard, we discovered Link’s track “Jack The Ripper.” We had inexplicably thus far missed that song until discovering it on the soundtrack of the American remake of Goddard’s A Bout De Souffle. This led to immediate acquisitions of The Original Rumble, Mr Guitar and the Missing Link volumes.

What other independent U.K. acts are you excited about?
2:54 are our favourite new British band. We say new, but we first heard Creeping and On a Wire in demo form about 18-months ago. Still no album (due out May 28th via Fat Possum). Mind, If the LP sounds as surly and mean and sexy as those two songs, we won’t complain with too much vehemence.

Then there is Femaleband. They sound like 4am.

Keel Her – she sounds like the sort of person that springs out of bed at 6am, jolly as a bean. But not in an annoying way, rather in a way that brings you steaming gourmet coffee, bakery-fresh croissants and a morning blow-job.

Blood Music sound like they sit in a plush Hackney loft apartment endlessly debating avant-garde European composers and the diacritic writings of Joris Karl Huysmans. And then, when even they are repulsed by the content of their own po-faced conversations, they casually knock of brilliance like Unending Blues

Our favourite new bands though are American and must be mentioned. Habibi‘s four demos are the Shangri-Las if they weren’t a seminal 60’s girl group, but instead a buried treasure on a Girls in the Garage compilation. Even the great Ellie Greenwich would have surely swooned.

And Hunters’ Hands On Fire EP is about to be played until we both cry blood.

Anything to add?

 * You won’t have heard of it – you’ll never need to.

Interview by Rob Peoni


Thought on Tracks Interview: The Bright Light Social Hour

Austin, Texas based band The Bright Light Social Hour, who recently played at MidPoint Music Festival 2011, will be returning to Cincinnati for a show at the MOTR Pub next Thursday, January 12th.  The band had a momentous rise in 2011 highlighted by touring in support of their self-titled LP, which was recognized with six Austin Music Awards at SXSW 2011.  The band is composed of Curtis Roush (guitar/vocals), Jack O’Brien (bass/vocals/moustache connoisseur), A.J. Vincent (keyboards/vocals), and Joseph Mirasole (drums) and recently took the time to answer some questions from our team here at Thought on Tracks.  So please enjoy getting a glimpse into a band that is sure to follow up their success in 2011 with an even bigger 2012.  The show at the MOTR Pub next Thursday night is FREE, so get off that couch and start your own personal 2012 concert year off right!

First off, congratulations on your self-titled LP and the recognition it received at SXSW 2011 winning Band of the Year, Album of the Year, and Song of the Year for “Detroit”.   When I listen to it I hear everything from Southern Rock to funk to psychedelic rock.  How would you describe your sound to someone who has never heard you?

I guess we’d say southern psychedelic rock? It’s got some soul and deep-funk and hard dance too.

What acts did you (and the band) listen to growing up that have influenced your current sound?  For instance, I hear some of The Doors with the organ in “Bare Hands Bare Feet”.  Am I right on that or just a coincidence?

Zeppelin, Daft Punk, Sly & The Family Stone, Slayer, Pink Floyd. Yup, that’s a 60’s Farfisa combo organ similar to the ones Ray Manzarek often played.

When I first got the album, the first thing that really stuck out to me was the cover art.  Can you give us the back-story here?  Because it’s absolutely ridiculous and fantastic in every way.

Curt and the art director independently had the idea of creating a sort of rock ‘n’ roll utopia scene, so we invited a bunch of friends out to the Greenbelt in Austin, told them to wear whatever and bring dogs and music and beer and whatever they felt like. The photographer and director would have us move around, but mainly everyone was just gettin down by the water and we later put together all the best shots for the album.

Can you go into the process the band takes when making music, specifically, the self-titled LP?  Do you play together when you write music and build off each other or separately?  How are the lyrics written?

A lot of the songs were born out of baby ideas for drum parts, riffs or vocal lines that we would then jam on extensively. When we’d find a feel that excited us, development would turn for that direction, and the process would gradually move from one of improvisation to one of refinement. Almost everything is written with the four of us in the room, every detail requiring approval from the entire group. One of us will bring in lyric concepts and ideas with the others giving input until we have something that fits the song.

What’s it like to be a band on the road and the inter-band dynamic along the way?

Man, that’s a huge question. It’s been a blast so far, but I think this latest tour video we threw together can answer a lot better than I can:

What is the Texas music scene like and your band’s place in it?  Had you asked me 5 years ago I would have said cowboys, rodeos, and country music, but with other rock acts such as White Denim getting more attention and notable festivals like Fun Fun Fun Fest and SXSW, it seems that the music scene is thriving as much as, and if not more, than Brooklyn.

There’ve been incredible acts of all types coming out of Texas for a long time. The Austin scene is crowded but prolific, healthy, and very supportive of its musicians. It’s hard to say what our place is because the scene is constantly growing and changing, but we’re really lucky to be rooted in such a supportive and enthusiastic music community that is happy to help us grow.

When will you begin work on your next album and how would you like to see your sound evolve going forward?

We’ve been working hard on new material for the next record, but it’s still a ways off. We try to have no preconceived ideas of what the music should sound like. We do our best to guide the songs in the way that feels right, but ultimately they are their own creatures. So far what we’ve got is a bit darker and and thicker, we’re very into it.

And the last, and certainly most important question.  Which wins in a cage fight and why: Jack’s moustache or Local Natives front man Taylor Rice’s one?

Hmm. I bet they could talk it out.

Connect with The Bright Light Social Hour via Twitter | Facebook | Website

Interview by Greg Dahman